Waterbot
To/From: dmanse@cascade.internal.gate, tenderson@cascade.internal.gate
I have some concerns about Dr. Wakeman's work on the waterbot AI.
You have my attention.
I read his proposal twelve months ago, and he's strayed a long way from its original parameters - he's integrated elements of IS-0142 with almost no documentation or precautions. It's extraordinary work, but needs oversight.
The waterbot is good for morale, people love it. I don't see anything to be concerned about it. It's doing a good job with the plants, too.
They share code-base with Security Bots and Defense Bots, but integrates 'living' technology from a poorly understood IS. Why am I the only one concerned?